Posts

New ask Hacker News story: Tell HN: Dont use Claude Design, lost access to my projects after unsubscribing

Tell HN: Dont use Claude Design, lost access to my projects after unsubscribing 12 by pycassa | 0 comments on Hacker News. I wanted to try codex after 5 months of claude code max subscription. And then I went back to my previous projects on claude design only to realize I don't have access to them anymore. This is a first. I never lost access to any of my past sessions because I unsubscribed in any of the LLM apps. I actually wanted to try out codex previously, but had similar experience with my credits. They gave extra credits equivalent to my montly subscription price, with some time limit because claude has so many issues that month. And as soon as plan ended. I lost access to the credits. Even after resubscribing, I still don't have access to those credits. I have sympathies towards the engineers, especially the ones that are putting themselves on X. But only when someone with large following has some issue, they sort it out. Having worked at a billing company, I can see...

New ask Hacker News story: Ask HN: Is Anthropic doing too much vibe coding?

Ask HN: Is Anthropic doing too much vibe coding? 4 by terabytest | 2 comments on Hacker News. The Claude app and Claude Code have been an unusable and buggy mess for me lately, has anyone else been experiencing this? Most of my messages get swallowed after sending them or the responses get interrupted or dropped. Sometimes entire conversations disappear from the sidebar only to reappear later. I’ve learnt that when a message appears not to have gone through or have errored midway, it often comes back with a valid response if I wait a bit and then restart the app. I wonder if it has anything to do with Anthropic eagerly embracing vibe coding.

New ask Hacker News story: Ask HN: What are you working on (non-AI)?

Ask HN: What are you working on (non-AI)? 6 by BrunoBernardino | 3 comments on Hacker News. Please don't turn this into an inflammatory post. Regardless of "AI" being good or bad (it's not even just one thing as many of you know), I feel like the "What are you working on?" posts are drowning in things that use AI for something and/or are clearly "AI slop". I'd like to look at things other humans have been doing (even if they used a bit of some kind of AI for assistance), that aren't a product or tool that uses AI for something. I know it exists (and I use and build some), but it's incredibly hard to find nowadays. Can you help me? Thank you.

New ask Hacker News story: agent-dash: TUI for managing Claude Code and OpenCode in tmux

agent-dash: TUI for managing Claude Code and OpenCode in tmux 2 by fdarian | 0 comments on Hacker News. https://ift.tt/O7sAEDJ There are a growing number of products/features to manage agent sessions. Few built-ins, new app, but this I made specifically for tmux users running Claude Code and OpenCode. It automatically detects all sessions without configuration I built this since Feb 2026, but I haven't yet properly documented the features. Dropping this here to see if anyone might be interested

New ask Hacker News story: Ask HN: If HTML supersedes Markdown fr AI, Will it be versatile enough for devs?

Ask HN: If HTML supersedes Markdown fr AI, Will it be versatile enough for devs? 3 by zameermfm | 4 comments on Hacker News. Isn't Markdown's hallmark its versatility while performant? I see there is an increasing call from tech community towards HTML to be adopted instead of Markdown due to its richness in the agentic communication layer. But is it versatile across any kind of interfaces? versatile with different format conversions? and performant (as the md is lightweight)?

New ask Hacker News story: Ask HN: Is Spam getting worse or is Gmail getting worse?

Ask HN: Is Spam getting worse or is Gmail getting worse? 4 by adamtaylor_13 | 2 comments on Hacker News. Over the past couple of months I've noticed that number of spam emails landing in my inbox has increased by quite a bit. I keep a very tidy inbox, so it's pretty easy for me to notice them and mark them as spam. But I'm curious: is Google just getting worse at detecting spam, or is the spam somehow evolving? For example, I just got this email: Sender: william_brown_318@rofopifj.dravixa.space Subject: the wagon is in The body contains tons of literal HTML tags that weren't parsed into actual HTML. Not sure if it was sent as a text mime-type or what, but it takes all of 2 whole seconds for me to mentally note that this is spam. How is this getting through more often these days?